They knew the
name but not the meaning, and they surely thought it odd, not to say ‘Fishy’.
It must have
been for this reason that it was changed. We first see Greenbank on the OS Map
25-inch 2nd series dated 1904.
Today the
‘lane’ is suffering blockages due to the Housing development at the House of
Faith sports field. However I would like to take you back not 100 years but
over 600 years to a time when another ‘blockage’ upset the local population. ~
The year was 1385 and the day was the
second Tuesday after Easter. This day was the old festival of Hockaday. The
custom was to have a fair and day of leisure but because it was not a ‘working
day’ it was convenient to have the local assize court meeting when miscreants
had no excuse to avoid attending.
The court
charge sheet says [in Latin] ~
“And that the
miller of Hanham unjustly took money (overcharged - or Short-measure?), and
that the ditch in Herynge Lane [Greenbank Rd] is blocked, and despite Maurice
Taylor’s promise of early repairs he will be subject to a fine”.
This report shows the Miller of Hanham
who is Wilielmus Heryng. His windmill was at the top of Heryngeslane at the site of the Cross Keys Pub. ‘Heringe Lane ’ is
referred to on Maps of Kingswood Chase of 1610 and 1672, and in the Government
Survey of 1652.
If Greenbank Rd was already known as 'Heryngeslane' in 1385 it seems likely that the Heryng family had lived
there and held the mill for many years.
So Heryngeslane is eponymous to the Heryng family
(Millers). The surname is of Anglo-Saxon origin.
The land on the
east side of the road drains to the south and west into the roadway. From this
I infer that the blockage must be a problem with the ditch on the east side
because an owner on the west would have protected himself by clearing any
blockage on his own side of the road. He and all users of the road would have
problems from a blockage on the east side. So I am guessing that Maurice Taylor
lived on the east side and maybe in the very place that is today the cause of a
detour that we hope will soon be eradicated.
As for the name
of the development ‘Abbotts Croft’ we must say the site never belonged to an
Abbott nor was there as far as we know a Croft. If it belonged to an estate other than the King it would
have been Barr’s Court
Roger Williams November 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment